|
В какой форме провести зачёт у заочников, если все аудиторные занятия в тот же день?
Задалась таким насущным вопросом... дать им тест? Или подготовить билеты?
|
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
Aspirant_Cat, дайте тест. Если предмет математизированный - можно несколько вариантов задачи. Потому что с устными ответами на билеты после лекций - глаза на лоб полезут и у них, и у Вас:D |
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
Добавлено через 2 минуты Цитата:
Добавлено через 3 минуты А рефераты заочники у Вас не пишут? Если пишут (может, заранее :) ), то можно студенту дать реферат другого студента для написания рецензии на эту работу. Или можно дать реферат с другого потока по этому же предмету. Я пробовала такую форму - мне очень понравилось, да и студентам интересно и полезно. К тому же это не так легко - написать рецензию |
Цитата:
|
Цитата:
Каждый проверяет 4 работы, анонимные и выставляет оценку по алгоритму. Дальше берется медиана по каждому пункту и считается общий балл. Естественно, что такое нельзя было упустить и я стащил кусок себе. В приступе неожиданной щедрости делюсь. Пример
Coursera Data Analysis Assignment Does the analysis have an introduction, methods, results, and conclusions section? 0: No serious attempt to answer complete the assignment 1: None of these elements are present 2: Only one of these elements is present 3: Only two of these elements are present 4: All three of these elements are present 5: All four elements are present. Are figures labeled and referred to by number in the text? 0: No figure at all 1: Figures are not labeled 2: Figures are poorly labeled and not referred to by number in the text 3: Figures are well labeled but not referred to by number in the text 4: Figures are well labeled and referred to by number in the text 5: Figure are exceptionally well labeled and referred to by number in the text Is the analysis written in clear and understandable English? 0: The analysis is not written in English. 1: The analysis is written in English that is not understandable or clear 2: The analysis is written in understandable English but is not clear 3: The analysis is written in understandable English and is somewhat clear 4: The analysis is written in clear and understandable English. 5: The analysis is written in exceptionally clear and understandable English Are the names of variables reported in plain language, rather than in coded names? 0: No variable names are used in the analysis 1: R variable names with no explanation are used in the analysis. 2: R variable names are used with explanation in the analysis 3: Plain language variable names are used but are not explained 4: Plain language variable names are used and explained 5: Variables in plain language are exceptionally clearly explained and used. Does the analysis report the number of observations/samples? 0: The analysis does not discuss the number of observations/samples 2: The analysis does not report the number of observations/samples overall 4: The analysis reports the overall number of observations, but not the number that play a role in each analysis 5: The analysis reports the number of observations used in each analysis Does the analysis report any missing data or other unusual features? 0: The analysis does not report on any potentially unusual features in the data 1: The analysis reports unusual features in the data but does not describe them 2: The analysis reports unusual features in the data and describes them 3: The analysis reports and explains the issues with unusual features in the data 4: The analysis reports, explains, and attempts to resolve issues with unusual features of the data 5: The analysis describes clearly unusual features in the data, the issues caused by those features, and solutions to the issues. Does the analysis include description and justification for data transformations? 0: The analysis does not report transformations that were performed. 3: The analysis reports transformations that were performed. 5: The analysis reports transformations that were performed and justifies them. Does the analysis include a discussion of potential confounders? 0: The analysis does not mention potential confounders. 1: The analysis mentions confounders but does not discuss their effect. 2: The analysis mentions confounders and describes their effect. 3: The analysis discusses confounders and potential avenues to address them. 4: The analysis discusses confounders and reports the approach for addressing them. 5: The analysis thoroughly discusses confounders, their effect, and the approach for addressing them. Are the statistical models correctly applied? 0: No statistical models are applied 1: Statistical models are applied but not described. 2: Statistical models are used and described, but incorrectly applied 4: Statistical models are described and correctly applied 5: Statistical models are exceptionally well described and applied. Are estimates reported with appropriate units and measures of uncertainty? 0: Estimates and uncertainty measures are not reported. 1: Estimates are reported but without uncertainty. 4: Estimates and measures of uncertainty are reported without units 5: Estimates and measures of uncertainty are reported with units Are estimators/predictions appropriately interpreted? 0: Estimators or predictions are not described. 1: Estimators or predictors are described but not interpreted 2: Estimators or predictors are described and interpreted incorrectly 4: Estimators or predictors are described and appropriately interpreted. 5: Estimators or predictors are exceptionally well described and interpreted Does the analysis make concrete conclusions? 0: The analysis does not make conclusions. 1: The analysis makes only vague conclusions. 2: The analysis makes concrete, but unsupported conclusions 5: The analysis makes concrete and well supported conclusions Does the analysis specify potential problems with the conclusions? 0: The analysis does not discuss potential problems with the conclusions 4: The analysis discusses potential problems with the conclusions 5: The analysis discusses potential problems with the conclusions and points out possible solutions Does the analysis include references for the statistical methods used? 0: The analysis includes no references. 1: The analysis includes references but they are not cited in the text. 3: The analysis is missing key references. 5: The analysis includes all appropriate references. FIGURE Is the figure caption descriptive enough to stand alone? 0: There is no figure caption 1: The figure caption is not comprehensible 2: The figure caption does not clearly explain the figure. 3: The figure caption is difficult to understand and is not enough to understand the figure 4: The figure caption is well written but is not enough to understand the figure 5: The figure caption explains the plot sufficiently to stand alone Does the figure focus on a key issue in the processing/modeling of the data? 0: The figure is not present 1: The figure is not comprehensible 3: The figure focuses on issues irrelevant to the main analysis 4: The figure focuses on key issues in the main analysis 5: The figure exceptionally illustrates and supports key points in the analysis. Are axes labeled in plain language and large enough to read? 0: There are no axis labels. 2: The axis labels are too small to read. 3: The axis labels use R variable names instead of plain language names 5: The axis labels and legends are clear, use plain language, and are large enough to read. Понятно, что прямо так сову на глобус не на тянешь, но если подойти с лаской и вазелином, то можно попробовать. Там более, что заочники друг друга не знают. А что касается ускоренной проверки тестов*, то берется листок в клеточку (можно отпечатать на принтере вместе с вопросами теста) и ответы ставятся в клеточки таблицы, а проверяется наложением заранее подготовленного куска расчерченного оргстекла с крестиками в нужном месте (а есть и прозрачные пленки для принтера). Другой вариант - в нужных местах бумажной карточки вырезаются "окошки". Это позволяет сразу увидеть число правильных ответов. ---- * если что, факт изобретения персонального компьютера в целом и компьютерного тестирования в частности мимо меня не прошел. |
Цитата:
|
0647, Именно! (шепотом) Но здесь ходют и гуманитарии, приходится шифроваться.
|
Цитата:
|
Текущее время: 08:13. Часовой пояс GMT +3. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc. Перевод: zCarot
© 2001—2024, «Аспирантура. Портал аспирантов»