Показать сообщение отдельно
Старый 01.06.2019, 13:26   #479
4gost
Platinum Member
 
Регистрация: 16.06.2014
Адрес: default city
Сообщений: 4,226
По умолчанию

Цитата:
Сообщение от kravets Посмотреть сообщение
Не по теме - занятный вопрос: что за причина "выкидывания" - Radar???
https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/s...-and-selection
Цитата:
In 2017 the Radar tool was launched, which is an Elsevier-made data analytics algorithm trained to identify outlier journal behavior in the Scopus database. Outlier journal examples include rapid and unexplainable changes to number of articles published or unexplainable changes in geographical diversity of authors or affiliations. Other features that the algorithm considers are self-citation rate and publication concerns, amongst others. The tool improves continuously by new examples or rules added to it and will initially run once a year checking the full Scopus journal base of around 22,800 titles for outlier behavior.
Ну и все три причины кратко:
Цитата:
To determine journal quality, Scopus runs the annual Re-evaluation program which identifies outlier and underperforming journals in three different ways:

1. Scopus identifies underperforming journals for Re-evaluation by using six metrics and benchmarks which all journals in the database must meet year after year. If a journal does not meet any of the six benchmarks for two consecutive years, the CSAB will re-evaluate the journal based on the Scopus title selection criteria with as potential outcome discontinuation of the journal its forward flow from Scopus.
2. Scopus identifies outlier journals for Re-evaluation by running the data analytics tool ‘Radar’ on an annual basis. This tool identifies journals demonstrating outlier behaviors such as sudden and exponential article output growth, unexplainable and sudden changes to affiliation country, or high journal self-citation rates, amongst others. All journals identified by the Radar tool will be re-evaluated by the CSAB in the year of identification. CSAB review is based on the Scopus title selection criteria and may result in discontinuation of the journal’s forward flow from Scopus.
3. Journals for which users, buyers or stakeholders have publication concerns will be added to Re-evaluation if the claim is identified as legitimate. The journal will be re-evaluated by the CSAB in the year of identification based on the Scopus title selection criteria with as potential outcome discontinuation of the journal its forward flow from Scopus.
Добавлено через 3 минуты
Цитата:
Сообщение от fikson Посмотреть сообщение
можно ли статью отнести в АР к индексируемым в БД Scopus или нет?
если конкретная статья находится в скопусе - то можно
---------
к.х.н., 02.00.06
4gost вне форума   Ответить с цитированием
Реклама