19.10.2013, 21:33
|
#3
|
Platinum Member
Регистрация: 17.09.2011
Сообщений: 2,771
|
Цитата:
Сообщение от IvanSpbRu
конкретный труд, но при этом отрицается абстрактный человек. Кто-нибудь может подсказать ссылку на это отрицание и на его причины?
|
Цитата:
Norman Geras claimed in Marx and Human Nature (1983) that although many Marxists denied that there was a "human nature" to be found in Marx's words,[1] there is in fact a Marxist conception of human nature which remains, to some degree, constant throughout history and across social boundaries. The sixth of the Theses on Feuerbach provided the basics for this interpretation of Marx according to which there was no eternal human nature to be found in his works. It states:
Feuerbach resolves the essence of religion into the essence of man [menschliche Wesen = ‘human nature’]. But the essence of man is no abstraction inherent in each single individual. In reality, it is the ensemble of the social relations. Feuerbach, who does not enter upon a criticism of this real essence is hence obliged:
1. To abstract from the historical process and to define the religious sentiment regarded by itself, and to presuppose an abstract — isolated - human individual.
2. The essence therefore can by him only be regarded as ‘species’, as an inner ‘dumb’ generality which unites many individuals only in a natural way. [2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marx%27...f_human_nature
|
дальше сами найдете
|
---------
Guide to DRM-Free Shopping http://www.defectivebydesign.org/guide/ebooks
|
|
|